|
Post by magentacandle on Feb 21, 2008 5:25:58 GMT
Here is a very interesting video of "camps" that are being built around the United States of America. I recommend that for those who wish to respond to my question, that those people click on the following link and watch this video before giving an answer. That way they will better understand the question. www.infowars.com/?p=215 My question is simple. Does anyone have a logical explanation for what the places in the video are, why they exist, what they are being built for, who runs them, and why there are new things being added to them, ect. ect? I am most interested to see what anybodies theories are.
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Feb 22, 2008 0:24:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Feb 23, 2008 22:28:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Feb 25, 2008 2:12:22 GMT
Here are two videos of an "internment camp" in Texas: uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TxYxTly-yo8&feature=related uk.youtube.com/watch?v=mntQogvuRI8&feature=related The privatized Hutto "jail", which is also administered by Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), contains more than just people who came over the boarder illegally. In fact, here is an article about palestinian refugees and CHILDREN being held in that camp: www.counterpunch.org/moses12192006.html In fact, Most of them are families including pregnant women and children who have never been accused of any wrongdoing but are forced to endure squalid conditions inside literal concentration camps. Allied to the burgeoning growth of the prison industry and future plans to detain American citizens on masse, new plans have revived the potential scope of the camp, and a new contract to intern 600 individuals was finalized with immigration authorities in December 2005. The facility is euphemistically called a "Residential Center," yet charges of overcrowding and poor conditions are rife, with an estimated 645 people filling a facility that has only 512 beds, as this article from the Texas Civil Rights Review clearly states - texascivilrightsreview.org/phpnuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=708 Innocent children should not be jailed and forced to live under traumatizing and dehumanizing conditions. Plain and simple. Suspicions will undoubtedly be cast as to whether the facility in Tyler is part of a wider agenda to set up a network of internment camps that will be used to forcibly detain American citizens under emergency provisions. And I think all Americans should be concerned when these camps are popping up everywhere. People, please. The government can eventually use them for whatever they want to. How many need to be built before we all stop them?
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Feb 27, 2008 6:15:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 1, 2008 4:05:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 1, 2008 4:06:13 GMT
Here is the actual United States Homeland Security document that outlines the plan to build "Detention Camps" all around the United States: cryptogon.com/docs/endgame.pdf It doesn't get any better than the actual document folks.
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 1, 2008 22:56:11 GMT
Here is a video that shows Oliver North being questioned about the "continuity of government" that could end up placing millions of Americans in FEMA concentration camps: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug0IL7k3elQ
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 4, 2008 3:48:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 5, 2008 2:53:50 GMT
Congressman Jim McDermot made a speech about the "internment camps" and the rounding up of American citizens during Martial Law in the United States: www.house.gov/mcdermott/sp030311.shtml In the speech, Congressman Jim McDermot said: "From 1982 to 1984, Colonel Oliver North assisted FEMA in drafting its civil defense preparations. Details of those plans emerged during the 1987 Iran-Contra scandal. They included executive orders providing for suspension of the Constitution, the imposition of martial law, internment camps, and the turning over of government to the President and FEMA."
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 6, 2008 3:24:46 GMT
Daniel Hamburg is a former Democratic Congressman who was elected to the 1st Congressional District of California in 1992 and also subsequently ran for Governor of California, finishing in 3rd place. Hamburg co-wrote a well-received recent article carried by the San Francisco Chronicle in which he outlined the program to incarcerate American citizens in internment camps, which have already been publicly built, during a time of declared national emergency. Here is the article that former Congressman Daniel Hamburg wrote about these "prison" camps for American citizens. www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...4/ED5OUPQJ7.DTL In the article, former Congressman Hamburg states that: "Since 9/11, and seemingly without the notice of most Americans, the federal government has assumed the authority to institute martial law, arrest a wide swath of dissidents (citizen and noncitizen alike), and detain people without legal or constitutional recourse in the event of "an emergency influx of immigrants in the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs." But I have already stated before that I think what the government claims these camps are for and what they are really for is two different things. They aren't permanently for illegal aliens because our government is currently pushing for the SPPA. A "north-american partnership" AKA North American Union AKA Open borders policy. And again, they are not just being built in the USA, they are being built all over the World.
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 7, 2008 2:47:11 GMT
Ritt Goldstein, an investigative reporter for the Herald, writes that recent pronouncements from the Bush administration and national security initiatives put in place in the Reagan era could see internment camps and martial law in the United States: www.arizona.indymedia.org/news/2002/08/3646 In the article, Ritt Goldstein writes: America as you know it is changing dramatically. The democratic freedoms which long defined American life are under siege. Today's Bush administration is moving towards America's military pursuing law enforcement, internment camps are on the horizon, and a member of the US Civil Rights Commission previously broached Arab-American internment.
Hidden behind FEMA’s benevolent face as the body whose chief responsibility is disaster relief, another FEMA exists. It is a FEMA that few know has been “charged by the Bush Administration with leading the nation’s anti-terrorism effortâ€, and a FEMA whose history includes nightmarish episodes in this vein.Here is another article by Mr. Goldstein that details plans for Martial Law in the United States which was published in the Sydney, Australia, Morning Herald: www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/27/...l?oneclick=true
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 7, 2008 20:32:15 GMT
Here is a copy of an article written by Jonathan Turley of the Los Angeles Times, On August 14th, 2002 entitled Camps for Citizens: Ashcroft’s Hellish Vision: www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/CfCAHV.pdfIn the article, Jonathan Turley writes: Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft’s announced desire for camps for U.S. citizens he deems to be "enemy combatants" has moved him from merely being a political embarrassment to being a constitutional menace.
Ashcroft’s plan, disclosed last week but little publicized, would allow him to order the indefinite incarceration of U.S. citizens and summarily strip them of their constitutional rights and access to the courts by declaring them enemy combatants.
The proposed camp plan should trigger immediate congressional hearings and reconsideration of Ashcroft’s fitness for this important office. Whereas Al Qaeda is a threat to the lives of our citizens, Ashcroft has become a clear and present threat to our liberties.
The camp plan was forged at an optimistic time for Ashcroft’s small inner circle, which has been carefully watching to test cases to see whether this vision could become a reality.
The cases of Jose Padilla and Yaser Esam Hamdi will determine whether U.S. citizens can be held without charges and subject to the arbitrary and unchecked authority of the government.Jonathan Turley's Blog: jonathanturley.org/
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 11, 2008 3:36:24 GMT
Nat Hentoff (born June 10, 1925) is an American historian, novelist, and columnist for the Village Voice, Legal Times, Washington Times, The Progressive, Editor & Publisher, Free Inquiry and Jewish World Review. Nat Hentoff received his B.A. with the highest honors from Northeastern University and did graduate work at Harvard. He was a Fulbright fellow at the Sorbonne in Paris in 1950. From 1953 through 1957 he was associate editor of Down Beat magazine. He was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship in education and an American Bar Association Silver Gavel Award in 1980 for his coverage of the law and criminal justice in his columns. In 1985 he was awarded an honorary Doctorate of Laws by Northeastern University. Here is an article by Nat Hentoff in the Village Voice in which he also outlines General Ashcroft's plans for Detention Camps in the United States: www.villagevoice.com/news/0236,hentoff,38006,6.html In the article, Hentoff states: "Now more Americans are also going to be dispossessed of every fundamental legal right in our system of justice and put into camps."Here is more info about Nat Hentoff: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nat_Hentoff
|
|
|
Post by magentacandle on Mar 12, 2008 22:21:02 GMT
Anita Ramasastry is a law professor at the University of Washington School of Law in Seattle and a director of the Shidler Center for Law, Commerce & Technology. She is also a regular columnist for the online legal commentary Writ. Ramasastry earned a B.A. in 1988 from Harvard University, a M.A. in 1990 from University of Sydney, and a J.D. in 1992 from Harvard Law School. Here is a CNN news article about Ashcrofts plan for detention camps in America done by Anita Ramasastry: archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/08/column...stry.detainees/In the article, Anita Ramasastry states: Attorney General Ashcroft and the White House are considering creating military detention camps for all U.S. citizens deemed by the administration to be enemy combatants. The internees will be deemed enemy combatants. By whom? By the military alone -- without any right to judicial review in a federal court or otherwise.The government's position is that its own decision as to who is an enemy combatant is binding on federal courts, and that it need not even offer the courts individualized facts to support particular detention decisions.We now are faced with a scary prospect -- indefinite detention of multiple citizens because the government decides they are dangerous. The mere suggestion of camps or group detention facilities implies that the Executive is, in fact, considering using its newfound citizen-combatant detention program on a broader scale.Here is more information about Anita Ramasastry: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Ramasastry
|
|